USPTO serial 75356308
ANDRITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2004
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ANDRITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
A-8045 Graz, AT
A-8045 Graz, AT
8045 Graz, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Montra Yazdani
Montra Yazdani Alix, Yale & Ristas, LLP150 Trumbull Street, Sixth FloorHartford, CT 06103United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SILOS AND PICKLING LINES, NAMELY, A SERIES OF METAL TANKS CONTAINING PICKLING ACID FOR PICKLING STRIPS OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | [ WOODYARD EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CRANES, DEBARKING DRUMS AND CHIPPERS; ]AUTOMATIC LOG SORTERS; [ MECHANICAL PULPING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, REFINERS; REFINER PLATES; PULP BLEACHING MACHINES, MIXERS, BLEACH TOWER DISCHARGE SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BLEACH TOWERS, SCRAPER ARMS, DISCHARGE PIPES, DILUTION SCREWS, AND DRIVE MOTORS; MACHINES FOR WASHING PULP AND FIBER; DEWATERING EQUIPMENT FOR PULP, FIBROUS MATERIAL AND SLUDGE, NAMELY, DOUBLE WIRE PRESSES, HEAVY-DUTY PRESSES, SCREW PRESSES, DEWATERING MACHINES, AND DISC FILTERS; STOCK PREPARATION MACHINES FOR PAPER AND PAPERBOARD; MACHINES FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PAPER TISSUE; HIGH EFFICIENCY HOODS FOR PAPER MACHINES; MACHINE VENTILATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, VENTILATING HOODS, WEB STABILIZERS AND BLOW BOXES INSTALLED IN MULTI-CYLINDER PAPER MACHINES; METAL ROLLING MILLS; MULTIPLE ROLL SETS, NAMELY, A PAIR OF ROLLS FORMING A NIP THROUGH WHICH METAL STRIPS PASS; HOT-ROLLING AND COLD-ROLLING MILLS OF METAL; MACHINES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT AND FINISHING OF STEEL STRIP; CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS; ROTARY PUMPS, NAMELY, STOCK PUMPS, MEDIUM-CONSISTENCY PUMPS, REACTOR PUMPS, AND MAIN COOLANT PUMPS; MECHANICAL SCREENS; THICKENING MACHINES FOR DEWATERING SLUDGE; BELT PRESSES; ] HIGH INTENSITY PRESSES; [ DISC FILTER, DRUM FILTER, AND PRESSURE FILTER MACHINES FOR DEWATERING SLUDGE AND PULP; POWER-OPERATED GRAIN PROCESSING EQUIPMENT; FEED MILLS; PELLETIZING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR EXTRUDING PELLETS FOR ANIMAL FEED AND ] DEBARKING PROCESS OPTIMIZATION SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DEBARKING DRUMS, SENSOR UNITS, MACHINES FOR SPLITTING THE FLOW OF TREES OR LOGS INTO STREAMS TO BE FURTHER PROCESSED OR FURTHER DEBARKED, AND MACHINES FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF BARK AND CONTROL THE TREES OR LOGS TO BE RECYCLED FOR FURTHER DEBARKING | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | OPTIMIZING EQUIPMENT FOR FLOCCULENT ADDITION TO DEWATERING PLANTS CONSISTING OF ELECTRONIC SENSORS, CONTROLS TO CALCULATE RESIDUAL MOISTURE IN THE SLUDGE TO BE DEWATERED, AND UNITS FOR MIXING IN THE NECESSARY AMOUNT OF FLOCCULENT TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM VALUE OF RESIDUAL MOISTURE; AND ELECTROLYTIC COATING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WASTE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MECHANICAL SCREENS, RAKES, PRESSES FOR SCREENINGS AND SAND FILTERING UNITS FOR THE TREATMENT OF EFFLUENTS; DRYING SYSTEMS FOR WASTE WATER SLUDGE CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DRUMS, FLUIDIZED BED DRIERS, CYCLONES, CRUSHERS, STORAGE SILOS, TRANSPORTATION AND MIXING SCREWS, BURNERS, PIPES, AIR BLOWERS AND COOLERS; INCINERATORS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE; AND SAND FILTERING UNITS FOR THE TREATMENT OF EFFLUENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | PICKLING LINES, NAMELY, A SERIES OF NON-METAL TANKS CONTAINING PICKLING ACID FOR PICKLING STRIPS OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRITZ AG
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRITZ AG
- Other trademarks owned by ANDRITZ AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ANDRITZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 24, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 24, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |