USPTO serial 75357874
PREMIUM-FLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2716633Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PREMIUM-FLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-32839 Steinheim-Sandebeck, DE
D-32839 Steinheim-Sandebeck, DE
D-32839 Steinheim-Sandebeck, DE
KRONOSPAN TECHNICAL COMPANY, LTD.
ENGOMI/NICOSIA, CY
NIEDERTEUFEN, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W. RENNER
JOHN W RENNER RENNER OTTO BOISSELLE & SKLAR PLL1621 EUCLID AVE 19TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metallic building materials, namely, plates, ledges, bars, rods and boards for building purposes; glued pressboard, chipboard and fiberboard made substantially of wood; parquet boards and plates; and high pressure laminates for floor coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kronospan GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kronospan GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Kronospan GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by KRONOSPAN TECHNICAL COMPANY, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by KRONOPLUS TECHNICAL AG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PREMIUM-FLOOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |