USPTO serial 75358415
CITY BREWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2001
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CITY BREWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID V RADACK
DAVID R BENNETT JENNER & BLOCK LLPONE IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant and bar services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interstate Hotels Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSTATE HOTELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSTATE HOTELS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSTATE HOTELS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CITY BREWS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |