USPTO serial 75358833
2KF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 2KF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | designing waste recycling facilities for processing waste materials | ACTIVE | May 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |