USPTO serial 75358966
BABY GOLF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY GOLF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP A. KANTOR, P.C.
PHILIP A KANTOR PC PLZ W AT SUMMERLINSTE 1401635 VILLAGE CTR CIRLAS VEGAS, NV 89134-6375Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, newborn, infant and toddler shirts, one-piece outfits, coveralls, pants and dresses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |