Drawing for T.E.C. TRULY EXTRAORDINARY COSMETICS

USPTO serial 75359038

T.E.C. TRULY EXTRAORDINARY COSMETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, KARLA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T.E.C. TRULY EXTRAORDINARY COSMETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL E RADIN

MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Color cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation makeup, blush, eye pencils, lip pencils, lip liners, mascara, loose powder; treatments namely face and body lotions, face and body creams, eye gels, face gels and body gels, toners, skin tightening lotions, skin firming creams, line removers, line lighterners, lip creams, moisturizing lotions, face and body scrubs, face and body cleansers; fragrances, namely, colognes, perfumes, room fragrances and potpourriACTIVE—
018Cosmetic accessories, namely, cosmetic cases sold empty, lipstick holders; bags, namely, tote bags, duffel bags, shoulder bags, backpack bags, travel bags, luggage bags, toiletry bags, beach bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance