USPTO serial 75359560
TMV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TMV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Rutherford, NJ
East Rutherford, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripherals for use in the field of telemedicine, and computer software for use in the field of telemedicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical monitoring devices for monitoring at remote locations a full range of functions and conditions, including temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, internal bodily sounds, blood oxygen levels, body weight and glucose levels | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and maintenance of telemedicine systems and components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | programming of telemedicine systems and components for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Telemedivision Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Telemedivision Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TMV
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |