USPTO serial 75361014
DYNAMIC MESSAGE SELECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMIC MESSAGE SELECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used in conjunction with a marketing database for extracting and creating computer files that direct the creation of customized and personalized marketing communications, namely, print material, telemarketing scripts, web pages on the global communications network, and interactive media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |