Drawing for SCOTIAMERCHANT

USPTO serial 75361284

SCOTIAMERCHANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOTIAMERCHANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic equipment, namely point of sale terminals; and computer software in the field of financial services, namely, data input, management, transmission, and reporting for credit, debit or smart/stored value card and electronic cash payment authorization and settlement transactionsACTIVE—
016printed instructional manuals and publications, namely, newsletters, brochures, pamphlets and books, all relating to credit card receivables in the banking industryACTIVE—
035direct mail advertising, electronic billboard advertising; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communication network; product demonstrations at conferences and/or trade showsACTIVE—
036banking services, namely, payment, authorization and settlement servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 11, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 19, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance