USPTO serial 75361352
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAURICE U CAHN
MAURICE U CAHN CAHN & SAMUELS LLP2000 P ST NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |