Drawing for PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS

USPTO serial 75361352

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MAURICE U CAHN

MAURICE U CAHN CAHN & SAMUELS LLP2000 P ST NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016publications, namely, a journal concerning topics in the fields of genomics and physiologyACTIVEJul 15, 1999
041educational services, namely, organizing and conducting scientific meetings and conferencesACTIVEApr 17, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 20, 2001PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Dec 15, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2000ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 21, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 1999CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Sep 3, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 29, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance