USPTO serial 75362067
XCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LON A LICATA
LON A LICATA FRASER STRYKER VAUGH MEUSEY OLSON ET AL500 ENERGY PLZ409 S 17TH STOMAHA, NE 68102-2663Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ISDN SERVICES; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETORK; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING NETWORK ACCESS POINTS THROUGH WHICH INFORMATION ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK PASSES FROM ON GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDER OR AN INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER ("ISP") TO ANOTHER; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE INTEGRATION OF VOICE AND DATA FOR TRANSFER OVER AN ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER MODE NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND DATA BY ELECTRONIC MEANS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA VIA RADIO FREQUENCY, FIBER OPTIC NETWORKING AND VIDEO MONITORING; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |