USPTO serial 75362796
AHL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AHL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A VANDERHYE
ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY, NAMELY, AGITATORS, MIXERS, DIGESTERS, THICKENER, BLEACHING TOWERS, PRESSES, FEEDERS, PULP SCREENERS, PULP CENTRIFUGAL CLEANERS AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |