USPTO serial 75363075
DYNAMIC VOLTAGE RESTORER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMIC VOLTAGE RESTORER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Solid State Voltage Regulators that Compensate for Changes in Voltage Level and Frequency, Shifts in Voltage Phase and other Sine Wave Integrity Characteristics | ACTIVE | Aug 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |