USPTO serial 75363102
DVR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DVR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Active power conditioners for compensating for voltage sags and swells in electric power transmission and distribution systems | ACTIVE | Aug 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |