CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for APPLICATION RENOVATION METHODOLOGY

USPTO serial 75363429

APPLICATION RENOVATION METHODOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2378219Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2000
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with APPLICATION RENOVATION METHODOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY-ELIZABETH BUCKLES

BRADFORD S BREEN ESQ ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARK PLZ STE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION FOR END TO END INTEGRATION OF TOOLS AND METHODS FOR GENERAL CODE CONVERSIONSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2007C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 27, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 26, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Mar 25, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance