USPTO serial 75363593
SECUREDROP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2766971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECUREDROP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACIE L. BROWN
ROBERT RYAN MORISHITA Morishita Law Firm4955 S. Durango Drive, Suite 153Las Vegas, NV 89148UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | coin receptacle boxes used in slot machines and other gaming equipment, including electronic memory for storing identification and operational information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Casinovations, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PREMIER TRUST OF NEVADA
- Other trademarks owned by VENDINGDATA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VENDINGDATA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Casinovations, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SECUREDROP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |