USPTO serial 75363816
BUSTERAID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUSTERAID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
sendai-shi, Miyagi, JP
sendai-shi, Miyagi, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN M MCGILLYCUDDY
JOAN M MCGILLYCUDDY HOPGOOD CALIMAFDE KALIL & JUDLOWE60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electromagnetic shields used for preventing or diminishing electromagnetic interference in electric apparatus, namely, computers, satellite arrays, copying machines, facsimile machines, wireless communication devices such as cellular phones, cellular station equipment and radio devices, telecommunication devices such as telephones and exchange equipment, video devices such as telephones, television sets, video cameras, still video cameras, display devices, audio devices such as CD players and DVD players, electronic bulletin boards, measuring devices such as network analyzers and spectrum analyzers, global positioning system equipment and navigation system equipment; sheets or tubes of plastic, resin and/or elastomer dispersed with metal powders for use as electromagnetic shields to prevent or diminish electromagnetic interference in electric apparatus, namely, computers, satellite arrays, copying machines, facsimile machines, wireless communication devices such as cellular phones, cellular station equipment and radio devices, telecommunication devices such as telephones and exchange equipment, video devices such as telephones, television sets, video cameras, still video cameras, display devices, audio devices such as CD players and DVD players, electronic bulletin boards, measuring devices such as network analyzers and spectrum analyzers, global positioning system equipment and navigation system equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |