USPTO serial 75363922
FUSIONWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUSIONWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Los Angeles, CA
West Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E LAWRENCE HARASYM III
BENJAMIN HERSHKOWITZ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | repository based computer software for handling the communication of messages between objects in a distributed, multi-platform environment that will facilitate the integration of business activities, their enabling technology and the role of users to form a secure collaborative environment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |