Drawing for TNS TARGET NUTRITION SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 75363980

TNS TARGET NUTRITION SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TNS TARGET NUTRITION SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STUART J. SINDER

STUART J SINDER KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030snack bars consisting primarily of cereals and grains with processed fruit, dairy products and/or nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance