USPTO serial 75365466
WAY TO GLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAY TO GLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD J LENKSZUS
JANICE W HOUSEY ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI & HOBBESPO BOX 10064MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail shop featuring non-electric glow in the dark merchandise, namely, glow in the dark toys, novelty gifts, and other non-safety-related devices | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |