USPTO serial 75365525
BOULDER NATURAL FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOULDER NATURAL FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT A KLUNDT
SCOTT A KLUNDT QUARLES & BRADY STREICH LANG LLPONE RENAISSANCE, TWO N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2319UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |