USPTO serial 75365655
ONE GOOD THING LEADS TO ANOTHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE GOOD THING LEADS TO ANOTHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THAD N LEACH
THAD N LEACH THOMPSON COBURN1 MERCANTILE CTRST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | full line of skin care products for moisturizing, hydrating, cleansing and exfoliating the skin, namely, lotions, body oils, bath oils, bath beads, liquid soap, solid soap, exfoliators, creams, scrubs, bath gels, scented sachets and pumice stones and pumice files for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | skin care products for massaging the skin, namely, non-electric massage apparatus and non-electric rollers for massage purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | bath pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | full line of skin care products for cleansing and exfoliating the skin, namely, loofahs, sponges, mesh sponges, nylon gloves, brushes, body buffs, exfoliating mitts and sisal goods, namely, mitts, towels buffs and straps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ONE GOOD THING LEADS TO ANOTHER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |