USPTO serial 75366099
P-CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with P-CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FLOYD E IVEY
FLOYD E IVEY LIEBLER IVEY & CONNOR PSP O BOX 6125KENNEWICK, WA 99336UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Use regarding computer software and/or computer programs operating with a credit card or purchasing card for the management of procurement processes to manage credit card orders, issues and audits; searches and reviews of supplier information; distribution of costs among departments within a company; approval of purchases; receiving and tracking of purchases; standardization and customization of reporting regarding the purchasing process; accounting for sales tax and federal income tax 1099 data; and other aspects of the procurement process | ABANDONED | Jun 7, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |