USPTO serial 75366310
SMARTSITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTSITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE
CHRISTIE BATY HEINZE FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in facilities management, building automation, commercial lighting installation and design, HVAC installation and design, energy services, and computer aided drafting and design | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Energy expense management; facilities management services for single or multi-site applications, namely, facilities maintenance management services for preventive maintenance, inventory control, work order control, inventory management and equipment scheduling and facilities asset management services for tracking and control of fixed assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building automation, namely, controlling heating, cooling, lighting, and security; commercial lighting, namely, installation and repair of commercial lighting; HVAC systems, namely, installation and repair of HVAC systems; and consulting service relating thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Strategic Resource Solutions Corp
- Other trademarks owned by Strategic Resource Solutions Corp
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SMARTSITE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |