USPTO serial 75366650
PORTACCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTACCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E LYNN PERRY
E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | vascular grafts | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | sutures, sepatal defect repair prostheses, surgical microscopes, endoscopes, aspirators, biopsy instruments, forceps, graspers, irrigation, devices, suture needles, temperature and ultrasonic probes, and surgical armrests | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training in the use of cardiovascular surgery medical devices; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of cardiovascular surgery techniques | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |