USPTO serial 75366764
HOME FRONT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME FRONT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily K. Breslin
EMILY K BRESLIN GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION133 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30348-5605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air filters for domestic use; air filters for air conditioning units; air filters for industrial application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |