USPTO serial 75366842
VIACTIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIACTIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NADINE P FLYNN
NADINE P FLYNN BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food products, namely, crackers, cookie bars and other bakery products | ACTIVE | Jan 3, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |