USPTO serial 75366957
HELIPROBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELIPROBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-374 24 Karlshamn, SE
S-374 24 Karlshamn, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAE H KIM
VINCENT A SIRECI C/O TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | diagnostic test kits for medical and veterinary use in testing for infection by Helicobacter pylori by analyzing metabolites such test kits being comprised of a dose of a radioactively-labelled compound and a device into which a patient exhales for capturing radioactive metabolitiess in the exhaled breath | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | diagnostic test kits for medical and veterinary use in testing for infection by Helicobacter pylori by analyzing metabolites, such test kits being comprised of a dose of a radioactively-labelled compound, a device into which a patient exhales for capturing radioactive metabolites in the exhaled breath, and a detector for determining radioactive metabolites in the exhaled breath | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |