CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for CYBERMIND

USPTO serial 75367191

CYBERMIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERMIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer systems comprised of computer hardware and computer software for the operation of interactive video games of virtual reality for use in entertainment arcades, adventure parks, restaurants, cafes, bars, gambling casinos, and public/private events; and computer video game softwareACTIVE—
021Mugs, cups and drinking glassesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely shirts, T-shirts, sweat shirts, shorts pants, jackets, sweaters, shoes, socks; skirts and hatsACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, hand held units for playing electronic games, mechanical figures, plush and action figuresACTIVE—
042Cafe and restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 15, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2001IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance