USPTO serial 75367356
C-V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Western Australia 6012, AU
Western Australia 6012, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD T SHEKLETON
GERALD T SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES; SPARKLING WINES; FORTIFIED WINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |