Drawing for LE BLE GOURMET

USPTO serial 75367495

LE BLE GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2583894Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 18, 2002
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LE BLE GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030wheat-based flour; preparations made from wheat, namely, bread and pastry; confectionery, namely, candy, chocolate and bakery goods; edible flavored ices; sauces; condiments, namely, mayonnaise, mustard and ketchup; spices; pasta; aromatic preparations for food, namely, seasonings; wheat-based foods, namely, biscuits; cocoa-based beverages, coffee-based beverages, chocolate-based beverages, wheat-based gruel with milk for food, precooked, cooked, dried or preserved whole wheat grain; precooked, cooked, dried or preserved, sweet or salted preparations based on precooked, cooked, dried or preserved whole wheat grain; wheat-based dried cereal flakes, chocolate, pancakes; farinaceous foods, namely, farina; cake paste, wheat-based beverages; chewing gum not for medical purposes; wheat-based groats for human food, non-medicinal infusions, flour-milling products, namely, flour; puddings, cake powder, namely, cake mix; sandwichesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Sep 21, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 18, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 27, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jan 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 19981.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
Jun 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance