Drawing for ORCA

USPTO serial 75367598

ORCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BERMAN, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H DEITS

DAVID H DEITS SEED & BERRY LLP6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ELECTROMECHANICAL APPARATUS FOR THE CONTROL, MONITORING AND OEPRATION OF APPLIANCES AND UTILITIES WITHIN A BUILDING; ELECTROMECHANICAL APPARATUS FOR THE CONTROL, MONITORING AND OPERATION OF THE SUPPLY OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES TO AND WITHIN A BUILDING OR TO AND WITHIN A UTILITY NETWORK; CONTROLS INCLUDING INPUT KEYS AND A DISPLAY SCREEN FOR CONTROLLING, MONITORING AND OPERATING APPLIANCES INCLUDING LIGHTS, STOVES, REFRIGERATORS, DRYERS, VENTILATION AND HEATING, VIDEO RECORDERS, TELEVISIONS, STEREO AND OTHER AUDIO SYSTEMS, AND OTHER APPLIANCES; CONTROLS INCLUDING INPUT KEYS AND A DISPLAY FOR CONTROLLING, MONITORING AND OPERATING UTILITIES IN A BUILDING; CONTROLS INCLUDING INPUT KEYS AND A DISPLAY SCREEN FOR CONTROLLING, MONITORING AND OPERATING THE SUPPLY OF UTILITIES IN A UTILITY NETWORK INCLUDING STEAM GENERATING, ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER SUPPLY, AND SANITARY SYSTEM; AND PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL OF THE ABOVEACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance