Drawing for MEDICAL EVALUATION SPECIALISTS

USPTO serial 75367843

MEDICAL EVALUATION SPECIALISTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2282570Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 5, 1999
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MEDICAL EVALUATION SPECIALISTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence K. Nodine

Lawrence K. Nodine Ballard Spahr LLP999 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1000Atlanta, GA 30309-3915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035physicians practice management services, namely, furnishing facilities, administrative and management support to physicians to facilitate their providing evaluationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 18, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2020RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 18, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 18, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 4, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 10, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 2, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 2, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 31, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 21, 200989AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 21, 200989AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 21, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 2, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 21, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 4, 2005815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 1999R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance