USPTO serial 75368684
ACTIVE KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Altos, CA
Los Altos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C NISHI
JOHN C NISHI WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and manuals sold as a unit, for providing access by means of electronic communications networks to educational information, seminars, workshops, courses or materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, providing instruction, classes, courses, seminars, and workshops by means electronic communications networks, all in the fields of business, business management, or business skills; evaluation of the progress of participants in the foregoing activities; development of educational materials for others in the fields of business, business management, or business skills | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer software design for others; computer services, namely, providing electronic text books, manuals, books, brochures, leaflets, fliers or course materials in the fields of business, business management, or business skills by means of electronic communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pensare, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pensare, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ACTIVE KNOWLEDGE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |