USPTO serial 75368717
CLEARSPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MELNICK, DIANE B.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEARSPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2800-Lyngby, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L SAPP
STEPHEN L SAPP LIDDELL SAPP ZIVLEY HILL & LABOON LLP2001 ROSS AVE STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | local area network and wide area network computer hardware and computer software, computer network interface and adapter cards for use on computers, together with modems in combination therewith, wiring structural components, HUBs and concentrators, controlled attachment modules, controlled access units and multistation access units, repeaters, bridges, routers, multiprotocol routers and brouters, chassis, modules, switches, modems, network management computer hardware, video conferencing computer hardware and instruction manuals all sold as a unit for use therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |