USPTO serial 75369338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsan Abrahamson, Katherine Spelman, Sophie Cohen, Lara Kehoe Hoffman, Molly Garhart
Knight-Ridder New Media, Inc.50 West San FernandoSuite 700San Jose, CA 95113| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing an interactive on-line data base which features employment counseling and recruiting | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |