USPTO serial 75369392
HYDROFLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RILEY, CAITLIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDROFLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUMNER C ROSENBERG
SUMNER C ROSENBERG NEEDLE & ROSENBERG PCTHE CANDLER BLDG STE 1200127 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30303-1811Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | laminated and textile fabrics for use as a component of home furnishings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |