Drawing for CNM

USPTO serial 75369439

CNM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CNM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J KERA

DAVID J KERA OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT FOR MANAGING, MONITORING AND CONTROLLING VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORKS -- NAMELY, SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AGENTS WITH EMBEDDED SOFTWARE, GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES, COMPUTER INTERFACE CONNECTIONS, MODEMS AND PROTOCOL SUITES, AUTOMATIC INVENTORY AND PROVISIONING METHODACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION, INCLUDING DEPLOYMENT AND ACTIVATION, OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, MONITORING, AND CONTROLLING VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSACTIVE—
042DESIGNING, FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING, MONITORING, AND CONTROLLING VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 23, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 23, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 23, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance