CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LENARD'S

USPTO serial 75369494

LENARD'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LENARD'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID O SEELEY

DAVID O SEELEY WORKMAN NYDEGGER & SEELEY1000 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fresh and processed meat, fish, poultry and game; non-living crustaceans; charcuterie; processed foods, namely, prepared vegetable salads and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; pate and cheeseACTIVE—
030Processed foods, namely, prepared pasta salads and prepared meals consisting primarily of pastaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 17, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 16, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance