USPTO serial 75369999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Kanata, Ontario K2K 2E6, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA PELLER LONDON
LAURENCE F HEFTER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, NAMELY, FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF DATA VOICE, IMAGES, AND VIDEO; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT FOR BROADBAND CONNECTIVITY USING PHOTONIC WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE CONTROL, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT OF DATA, VOICE, IMAGES AND VIDEO TRANSMISSIONS OVER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES; COMMUNICATION HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN SERVICES; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION RELATING TO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |