Drawing for WIC SMART CARD

USPTO serial 75370237

WIC SMART CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, STACEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIC SMART CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAIVA K TAUTVYDAS

DAIVA K TAUTVYDAS CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical and scientific apparatuses, namely, software, hardware and consumer terminals for transaction and database processing, electronic access cards, and integrated chip cardsABANDONED—
042custom design of software and hardware for transaction and database processingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance