USPTO serial 75370560
P
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M KUHN
PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP1 BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Anti-theft home alarms, remote controls for use with alarm systems; electronics for vehicles, namely, hi-fi stereo amplifiers; remote vehicle opener systems consisting primarily of a radio transmitter and a receiver; sirens for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Automobile parts, namely, power door locks and power window regulators; anti-theft alarms for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PST Industria Eletronica da Amazonia Ltda.
- Other trademarks owned by PST Industria Eletronica da Amazonia Ltda.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named P
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |