Drawing for BRUGG OPGW DESIGN

USPTO serial 75370901

BRUGG OPGW DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCGEE, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRUGG OPGW DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARINA T LARSON

Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLCP O Box 5940Dillon, CO 80435-5940UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal, non-electric cable, wires and wire ropes; metal pipes, tubes and fittings; non-electric cables, wires and wire rope made primarily of metal; pipes, tubes and fittings therefor made primarily of metal; cable joints for non-electric cables made of metal and primarily of metalACTIVE—
009Electric cables and wires and accessories therefor, namely, plastic caps for sealing ends of electric and non-electric cables and wires, insulated electrical connectors, couplers, electric plugs; splicing accessories, namely join boxes and fiber patches; optical fibers and related accessories, namely optical waveguides, optical conductors, otical fiber cables, otical ground wires and otical plugsACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of electric, non-electric and high-voltage cables and wires and fiber optic cables and wires, construction of high voltage linesACTIVE—
041Educational and teaching services, namely seminars and workshops in the field of installation, maintenance and construction of electric lines, namely high voltage linesACTIVE—
042Technical consultation in the field of electric lines, namely high voltage electric lines; planning of installation of non-electric cables and wiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 13, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 26, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance