Drawing for TRILOGY.COM

USPTO serial 75371799

TRILOGY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRILOGY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

RICHARD J GROSS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2400AUSTIN, TX 78701-2978UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to configure, quote prices for, and formulate orders for products, processes and services, and user manuals all sold as a unitACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing training in the field of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—
042Computer software design for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance