USPTO serial 75371965
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUSSELL H. FALCONER
ROBERT L SHERMAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022-3205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, TOILET WATER; GELS, SALTS FOR THE BATH AND THE SHOWER; TOILET SOAPS; BODY DEODORANTS; COSMETICS NAMELY CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS FOR THE FACE, THE BODY AND THE HANDS; SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS; MAKEUP PREPARATIONS; SHAMPOOS; GELS, SPRAYS, MOUSSES AND BALMS FOR THE HAIR STYLING AND HAIR CARE; HAIR LACQUERS; HAIR COLOURING AND HAIR DECOLORANT PREPARATIONS; PERMANENT WAVING AND CURLING PREPARATIONS; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; DENTIFRICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |