USPTO serial 75373584
CRAB-BUSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRAB-BUSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen T. Falk
STEPHEN T FALK ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY100 INDEPENDENCE MALL WPHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2399UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | herbicides for use in agriculture, forestry and horticulture; and for non-agricultural uses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |