USPTO serial 75373661
APDS ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE DESIGN SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APDS ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE DESIGN SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RODNEY A NOWLAND
TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR1 OWENS CORNING PKWYTOLEDO, OH 43659UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN VIA COMPUTER OF HOUSES INCORPORATING SOUND EFFICIENCIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APDS ACOUSTICAL PERFORMANCE DESIGN SYSTEM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |