USPTO serial 75373812
REVISION PATHWAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVISION PATHWAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE S RICKLES
LAURENCE S RICKLES 1 JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-7001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive multimedia computer program relating to orthopedic products, namely, to review surgical procedures and protocol | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |