Drawing for KIDCAM

USPTO serial 75373995

KIDCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KIDCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN A HENDERSON

500 XEROX CTR55 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038video conferencing with children at day care facilitiesACTIVEJul 1, 1997
042computer services offered via a global computer network whereby parents can obtain information concerning day care facilities and monitor their children's activities at such day care facilitiesACTIVEJul 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 4, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 1999OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 1, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance