USPTO serial 75374229
AUTOBALANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOBALANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SW1X 0NA, GB
London SW1X 0NA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCILLE P NICHOLS
LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals used in the manufacture of wheels and tires and chemicals used for balancing wheels and tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | power operated guns for injecting gels into wheels and tires; air compressors and compressed air pumps for injection of gels into wheels and tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | tire balancing units for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consultation in the automobile, wheel and tire industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Services providing for the balancing of wheels and tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MATERIAL TESTING; PATENT EXPLOITATION IN RELATION TO CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS, NAMELY, GELS FOR BALANCING WHEELS AND TIRES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF BALANCING WHEELS AND TIRES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Autobalance Plc.
- Other trademarks owned by Autobalance Plc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AUTOBALANCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |